Episode notes
Episode Time Stamps:
00:00 – Introduction
02:06 – What are CoinJoins and how are today’s mixing services different from the tumblers of the old days?
03:55 – What is P2EP (Pay to End Point)?
5:30 – What is the origins of P2EP?
08:20 – PayJoin and how it originates from BustaPay
09:20 – Samourai’s Cahoots or Stoveaway transactions, and why they’re PayJoins but not PayToEndPoints
11:02 – Why P2EP has more potential than PayJoins
12:00 – Cool negotiations that can be done between parties when sending Pay to End Point (P2EP) transactions
13:50 – Why P2EP helps a lot of bitcoiners’ privacy, but not everyone’s
14:15 – CoinJoins vs P2EP in terms of efficiency to reach privacy
15:00 – Why P2EP doesn’t directly improve your privacy, but tricks blockchain analysis
16:30 – CoinJoins are identifiable
17:45 – Is Wasabi Wallet censorship resistant?
19:42 – The 3 issues of building electronic money, according to cypherpunk literature
22:10 – Bitcoin privacy vs fungibility
23:05 – Wasabi’s new mixing technology
25:40 – Which desktop and mobile wallet does Nopara recommend to a newbie?
27:40 – Discussion on Blockstream Green
28:31 – Wasabi vs JoinMarket vs Samourai
29:48 – Don’t use Samourai
33:30 – Why Wasabi requires more BTC to enter CoinJoins than Samourai
36:30 – What is planned for the Wasabi Wallet UX?
36:50 – Wasabi hired a cryptographer named Istvan Seres who is as knowledgeable as Greg Maxwell
38:10 – What is next for Nopara?
40:50 – Wasabi getting involved in Pay to End Point with BTCPay Server
41:50 – Can Liquid improve CoinJoins?
43:55 – Will Bitcoin privacy happen in side chains, or should the base layer get fixed?
45:30 – Wasabi’s hardware wallet integration
47:58 – Was Samson Mow right about CoinJoins being tainted correct? Is it justified to speak of Pay to End Point as opposed to PayJoins?
49:34 – P2EP and PayJoin need new and different names?
49:58 – Who can we trust, what should we verify?
52:30 – Bitstein’s presentation from BigBlockBoom where he referenced Schopenhauer’s “The Art of Controversy” to distinguish between rhetoric and dialectics